WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
夏目漱石『草枕』とロレンス・スターン『トリストラム・シャンディの生活と意見』
https://seisen.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/280
https://seisen.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/28089f7b6cf-1b5e-4bb3-8deb-c0db955fe1aa
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00000682851.pdf (751.9 kB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文(ELS) / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 1996-12-25 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | 夏目漱石『草枕』とロレンス・スターン『トリストラム・シャンディの生活と意見』 | |||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||
| タイトル | Natsume Soseki's Kusamakura and Laurence Stern's The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy | |||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||
| ページ属性 | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | P(論文) | |||||||
| 論文名よみ | ||||||||
| その他のタイトル | 夏目漱石『草枕』トロレンス・スターン『トリストラム・シャンディノ生活ト意見』 | |||||||
| 著者名(日) |
剣持, 武彦
× 剣持, 武彦
|
|||||||
| 著者名よみ |
ケンモチ, タケヒコ
× ケンモチ, タケヒコ
|
|||||||
| 著者名(英) |
Kenmochi, Takehiko
× Kenmochi, Takehiko
|
|||||||
| 著者所属(日) | ||||||||
| 清泉女子大学 | ||||||||
| 著者所属(英) | ||||||||
| en | ||||||||
| SEISEN UNIVERSITY | ||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||
| 内容記述 | Why has so little attention been paid to the relationship between Natsume Soseki's Kusamakura (June 1906) and Laurence Stern's The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy ? It may well be because Soseki's Wagahai wa neko de aru (I Am a Cat), which had been completed just before his writing Kusamakura, is so clearly established to have been influenced by Tristram Shandy. In Kusamakura, on the other hand, Soseki deliberately changed his setting, style, and technique, and as a consequence, critics ignored any similarity between I am a Cat and Kusamakura in terms of their indebtedness to Tristram Shandy. What do I Am a Cat and Kusamakura have in common ? Both works had been written to destroy the traditional concepts of the novel. Soseki had been studying 18th century British literature with special attention to Tristram Shandy and its powerful influence on the canon of British fictional writing, having written an essay on Tristram Shandy in March 1897, nine years prior to writing Kusamakura. The novel Tristram Shandy demonstrated that a novel could be successfully written without a coherent story line. As is well known, 19th century realism had reached its ultimate limit in France and Russia and had nowhere to go. Then, the 20th century produced the literature of Proust and Joyce, whose works are associated with the technique known as the "stream of consciousness." Might it be said that Soseki wrote Kusamakura using the stream of consciousness technique, seven years before A la recherche du lemps perdu (1913-27) and 16 years before Ulysses (1922) ? The present study explores this possibility. | |||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00128384 | |||||||
| 書誌情報 |
清泉女子大学紀要 巻 44, p. 51-62, 発行日 1996-12-25 |
|||||||
Share
Cite as
剣持, 武彦, 1996, Natsume Soseki's Kusamakura and Laurence Stern's The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy: 51–62 p.
Loading...
