WEKO3
インデックスリンク
-
RootNode
アイテム
『小学校社会科学習指導要領補説』における「作業単元」展開の特質 : 『社会科作業単元展開の実際』との比較から(学校教育)
https://swu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/4159
https://swu.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/41591334344b-bbfb-4e10-adfc-d99602386566
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KJ00004435355.pdf (1.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | [ELS]紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2017-02-16 | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | 『小学校社会科学習指導要領補説』における「作業単元」展開の特質 : 『社会科作業単元展開の実際』との比較から(学校教育) | |||||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||||
| タイトル | The Characteristics of How to Develop a Unit of Work in The Supplement to the Course of Study for Social Studies in Elementary Schools, 1948 From a Comparison with The Practical Side of How to Develop a Unit of Work for Social Studies, 1948 (School Education) | |||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||||
| 雑誌書誌ID | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00038441 | |||||||||||
| 著者 |
鈴木, 円
× 鈴木, 円
× Suzuki, Madoka
|
|||||||||||
| 記事種別(日) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 学校教育 | |||||||||||
| 記事種別(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | School Education | |||||||||||
| 抄録(英) | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | The Supplement to the Course of Study for Social Studies in Elementary Schools, 1948 was compiled as a supplement to The Tentative Course of Study for Social Studies I, 1947, the compilation of which was due to the proposal of Helen Heffernan, Elementary Schools Officer of Civil Information and Education Section. But before this book was compiled, The Practical Side of How to Develop a Unit of Work for Social Studies, 1948 was also compiled under Heffernan's guidance. Both these books explained how to develop "a Unit of Work" in social studies, but they had some differences in the developing method. These differences were caused by the difference of the interpersonal relationship between Heffernan and their compilers, and the difference of their compilers' interpretation of social studies. The Practical Side which was faithful to Heffernan's guidance showed the possible ways to promote a child's understandings, critical thinking skills, and desirable attitudes steadily. On the contrary, The Supplement which was more faithful to the view of social studies in The Tentative Course of Study than to the guidance of Heffernan assumed that a unit of work for problem-solving study would naturally develop a child's ability. So the developing method in The Supplement showed no clear aims for promoting understandings, critical thinking skills, and desirable attitudes. However, many Japanese concerned with social studies acknowledged the method of The Supplement as a typical method for developing a unit of work. As a result, The Supplement put the early years of Japanese experimental approaches to social studies in a complex and difficult situation. | |||||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
學苑 en : GAKUEN 巻 788, p. 48-61, 発行日 2006-06-01 |
|||||||||||
| 表示順 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | 8 | |||||||||||
| アクセション番号 | ||||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||||
| 内容記述 | KJ00004435355 | |||||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 13480103 | |||||||||||
Share
Cite as
鈴木, 円, Suzuki, Madoka, 2006, The Characteristics of How to Develop a Unit of Work in The Supplement to the Course of Study for Social Studies in Elementary Schools, 1948 From a Comparison with The Practical Side of How to Develop a Unit of Work for Social Studies, 1948 (School Education): 48–61 p.
Loading...
