WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
ヘーゲルにおける＜私人＞論の転換 : 『精神現象学』における個体Individuumと個別者Einzelne
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9391
https://stars.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9391cb8d1a84-c1b1-4ec4-9f40-e90a4a1411a2
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
竹内真澄 (1.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2021-09-22 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | ヘーゲルにおける＜私人＞論の転換 : 『精神現象学』における個体Individuumと個別者Einzelne | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | ヘーゲル｜私人｜個別者｜個体｜精神現象学 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
竹内, 真澄
× 竹内, 真澄× TAKEUCHI, Masumi |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | Modern social theory, from Hobbes to Simith, is based on the concept of “private man. ”According to Hegel, private man appears after the decline of communities. It refers to the atomistic type of human being in modern society. From the point of view of young Hegel, private man lost the totality, but he also recognizes the value of private man in history in a definite sense. Then, he establishes the schema, that is to say, community-society-high level of community. Correspondingly, human beings move from Individuum via Einzelne to a high level of Individuum. Hegel examines the experimental thoughts about dialectics in the Jenaer period (1801-1807). Through works preceding The Phenomenology of Spirit, including The Spirit of Christianity and its Fate, The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s Systems of Philosophy, The Critics of Modern Natural Law, and Jenaer Real Philosophy, he analyzes the self-formation from Einzelne to general Individuum, which is the main purpose of phenomenology. I examine that Hegel adds the concept of private man to the context of dialectics between Individuum and Einzelne. He establishes the base for the dialectics Allgemeinheit-Besonderheit-Einzelheit. However, he identifies Einzelheit with Individualität at the end, on the same condition of private property, regardless of categorical distinction of the two. This brings about the criticisms of Kierkegaad and Marx. |
|||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 桃山学院大学社会学論集 en : ST.ANDREW'S UNIVERSITY SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW 巻 55, 号 1, p. 23-64, 発行日 2021-09-28 |
|||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 桃山学院大学総合研究所 | |||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 02876647 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00240577 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
