WEKO3
-
RootNode
アイテム
観念的貨幣尺度説批判の再検討 : 1819年のアトウッド書簡によせて《論文》
https://doi.org/10.24561/00018128
https://doi.org/10.24561/000181284aee28ae-5be6-48dd-a37c-fb2d1c438bfa
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
KY-AN00109186-152-06.pdf (1.2 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2018-05-18 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 観念的貨幣尺度説批判の再検討 : 1819年のアトウッド書簡によせて《論文》 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24561/00018128 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| タイトル（別言語） | ||||||||||
| その他のタイトル | Reconsidering Marx’s Critique of the Doctrine of ‘Das ideale Geldmaß’ : Two Letters of Thomas Attwood in 1819. | |||||||||
| 著者 |
結城, 剛志
× 結城, 剛志
|
|||||||||
| 著者 ローマ字 | ||||||||||
| 値 | YUKI, Tsuyoshi | |||||||||
| 著者 所属 | ||||||||||
| 値 | 埼玉大学大学院人文社会科学研究科准教授 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
社会科学論集 en : SHAKAIKAGAKU－RONSHU (The Social Science Review) 巻 152・153合併号, p. 41-60, 発行日 2018 |
|||||||||
| 年月次 | ||||||||||
| 値 | 2018-3 | |||||||||
| 出版者名 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 埼玉大学経済学会 | |||||||||
| 出版者名（別言語） | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | The Economics Society of Saitama University | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 05597056 | |||||||||
| 概要 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | Generally speaking, the Marxist approach cannot explain the modern banking system because of its stand on metallism. We find that this misapprehension occurs not only in Schumpeter’s summarization of monetary doctrines as metallism but also in Marx’s critique of Attwood’s ideal account of money. The former can be rectified easily by analyzing the concept of the commodity, but research on the latter has been limited. In Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie（1859）, it seems that Marx supports the ‘real’ concept of money or money as metal since he obviously denies the ideal or nominal concept of money. However, this study provides another interpretation―that the notion of ‘ideal’ does not necessarily signify nonvalue nor need it be unrelated to the commodity economy in Marx’s sense ― by reconsidering the historical understanding of the debates regarding the ideal account of money. We focus on two letters from Attwood to the Earl of Liverpool indicating that Attwood’s concept of the ideal has three purposes. The first is to move the monetary system from the gold standard of value to the real value of the pound because economic subjects commonly have fine gold in mind when they present an ideal account of money rather than gold coins circulated as sovereigns. The second is to treat monetary value as inter-temporal because artificial changes in the standard of value can cause confusion in the credit-debt relationship. The third is to raise prices and promote national wealth by extending the Bank Restriction Act because reverting to the gold standard can lead both to depreciating prices and to a shrinking national economy. The result of the examination clarifies the linkage between the value of the ideal account of money and the commodity economy and considers inconsistencies in the concept of value in the two letters. | |||||||||
| 版 | ||||||||||
| 値 | [出版社版] | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | text | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
| 作成日 | ||||||||||
| 日付 | 2018-05-18 | |||||||||
| 日付タイプ | Created | |||||||||
| アイテムID | ||||||||||
| 値 | KY-AN00109186-152-06 | |||||||||
