WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "1f5253a1-9c8f-40d3-8c81-b58c65fe33b5"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 1, "id": "12086", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "12086"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00012086", "sets": ["659"]}, "author_link": ["46036"], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2019-06-30", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicIssueNumber": "1", "bibliographicPageEnd": "98", "bibliographicPageStart": "71", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "16", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "中央ロー・ジャーナル"}]}]}, "item_10002_description_19": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10002_description_5": {"attribute_name": "抄録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Some cases of comparative negligence in contract law have found fault by the injured party in breaching a duty contemplated by the agreement. Other cases, however, have gone beyond that. They have found the injured party at fault because of unreasonable actions, despite the absence of a clear agreement.\nIn contractual duty cases, the rationale of comparative negligence is based on the expression of the agreement of both parties. However, that analysis falters in non-contractual duty cases. \n Why should an injured party be required to behave reasonably in the absence of a contractual obligation? The presence of an agreement or contract is not enough to explain all cases of comparative negligence. ", "subitem_description_type": "Abstract"}]}, "item_10002_full_name_32": {"attribute_name": "著者別名(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "46036", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}], "names": [{"name": "SAITO, Kou", "nameLang": "en"}]}]}, "item_10002_publisher_8": {"attribute_name": "出版者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会"}]}, "item_10002_rights_15": {"attribute_name": "権利", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_rights": "この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_9": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "1349-6239", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10002_version_type_20": {"attribute_name": "著者版フラグ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85", "subitem_version_type": "VoR"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "齋藤, 航"}, {"creatorName": "サイトウ, コウ", "creatorNameLang": "ja-Kana"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "46036", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2020-07-29"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "1349-6239_16_1_71-98.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "977.0 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 977000.0, "url": {"label": "本文を見る", "url": "https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/12086/files/1349-6239_16_1_71-98.pdf"}, "version_id": "41943733-246b-4c7d-b442-71cd64efd661"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "過失相殺", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "契約", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "損害賠償", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "民法418条", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質 (3)", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質 (3)"}, {"subitem_title": "“Comparative Negligence” in the Law of Contract (3)", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "1", "path": ["659"], "permalink_uri": "https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/12086", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2020-07-29"}, "publish_date": "2020-07-29", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "12086", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質 (3)"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質 (3)
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/12086
https://chuo-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/120864a47b137-6fe5-4827-ab02-9af17b68fba6
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
本文を見る (977.0 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2020-07-29 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | 契約違反における過失相殺の法的性質 (3) | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
タイトル | “Comparative Negligence” in the Law of Contract (3) | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 過失相殺 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 契約 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 損害賠償 | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | 民法418条 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
著者 |
齋藤, 航
× 齋藤, 航 |
|||||
著者別名(英) | ||||||
姓名 | SAITO, Kou | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Some cases of comparative negligence in contract law have found fault by the injured party in breaching a duty contemplated by the agreement. Other cases, however, have gone beyond that. They have found the injured party at fault because of unreasonable actions, despite the absence of a clear agreement. In contractual duty cases, the rationale of comparative negligence is based on the expression of the agreement of both parties. However, that analysis falters in non-contractual duty cases. Why should an injured party be required to behave reasonably in the absence of a contractual obligation? The presence of an agreement or contract is not enough to explain all cases of comparative negligence. |
|||||
書誌情報 |
中央ロー・ジャーナル 巻 16, 号 1, p. 71-98, 発行日 2019-06-30 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
出版者 | 中央ロー・ジャーナル編集委員会 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1349-6239 | |||||
権利 | ||||||
権利情報 | この資料の著作権は、資料の著作者または学校法人中央大学に帰属します。著作権法が定める私的利用・引用を超える使用を希望される場合には、掲載誌発行部局へお問い合わせください。 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 |